Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

The Role of Technology Acceptance in Predicting Knowledge Sharing Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Ghasem Salimi 1 , * , Mehdi Mohamaddi 1 , Mahboubeh Mehrvarz 1 and Kamal Hashemi 1
Authors Information
1 Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: 15 (1); e87036
  • Published Online: January 28, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 15, 2017
  • Revised: November 15, 2017
  • Accepted: November 20, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.87036

To Cite: Salimi G, Mohamaddi M, Mehrvarz M , Hashemi K. The Role of Technology Acceptance in Predicting Knowledge Sharing Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Strides Dev Med Educ. Online ahead of Print ; 15(1):e87036. doi: 10.5812/sdme.87036.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Koushazade SA, Omidianpoor S, Zohurian M. The impact of organizational factors on the effectiveness of knowledge management among nurses. Int J Hospital Res. 2015;4(3):129-35.
  • 2. Sohail MS, Daud S. Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: Perspectives from Malaysia. Vine. 2009;39(2):125-42.
  • 3. Sa’adati Azar A, Nasiri MJ, Nasiri S. Knowledge sharing: The key factors in the success of knowledge management system in the organizational health of the employees working in the public universities of Tehran. Manag Issue Healthcare Sys. 2016;2:34-42. doi: 10.19259/mihs.2016.01.04.
  • 4. Shaheen M, Panchapakesan Kumari C. Role of knowledge sharing in the learning process. Literacy Inf Comput Educ J. 2013;Special 2(1):1292-8. doi: 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0171.
  • 5. Liao C, Wang HY, Chuang SH, Shih ML, Liu CC. Enhancing knowledge management for RD innovation and firm performance: An integrative view. Afr J Bus Manag. 2010;4(14):3026-38.
  • 6. Chin Wei C, Siong Choy C, Geok Chew G, Yee Yen Y. Knowledge sharing patterns of undergraduate students. Libr Rev. 2012;61(5):327-44. doi: 10.1108/00242531211280469.
  • 7. Kim D. The effects of knowledge sharing on program performance: Influences on CPS program performance [dissertation]. Virginia Tech; 2011.
  • 8. Chong CW, Teh PL, Tan BC. Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: Do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter? Educ Stud. 2013;40(1):1-25. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2013.825577.
  • 9. Meddour H, Abdul Majid AM, Yusoff RZ. The impact of information technology and networks on knowledge transfer and sharing: The mediating role of trust. World J Manag Behav Stud. 2016;4(1):31-40. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wjmbs.2016.4.1.1326.
  • 10. Zhang X, Chen Z, Vogel D, Yuan M, Guo C. Knowledge-sharing reward dynamics in knowledge management systems: Game theory-based empirical validation. Hum Factor Ergon Man. 2010;20(2):103-22. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20203.
  • 11. Zhang X, de Pablos PO, Xu Q. Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.021.
  • 12. Al-Hawamdeh S. Knowledge management: Cultivating knowledge professionals. Oxford: Chandos Pub; 2003. doi: 10.1533/9781780631936.
  • 13. Razmerita L, Kirchner K, Nielsen P. What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication. J Knowl Manag. 2016;20(6):1225-46. doi: 10.1108/jkm-03-2016-0112.
  • 14. Riege A. Three‐dozen knowledge‐sharing barriers managers must consider. J Knowl Manag. 2005;9(3):18-35. doi: 10.1108/13673270510602746.
  • 15. Ong HB, Yeap PF, Tan SH, Chong LL. Factors influencing knowledge sharing among undergraduate students. Ind High Educ. 2011;25(2):133-40. doi: 10.5367/ihe.2011.0035.
  • 16. Hussein ARH, Nassuora AB. Jordanian student's attitudes and perceptions towards knowledge sharing in institutions of higher education. Int J Acad Res. 2011;3(4):401-5.
  • 17. Majid S, Chitra PK. Role of knowledge sharing in the learning process. Literacy Inf Comput Educ J. 2013;Special 2(1):1292-8. doi: 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0171.
  • 18. Fullwood R, Rowley J, Delbridge R. Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. J Knowl Manag. 2013;17(1):123-36. doi: 10.1108/13673271311300831.
  • 19. van den Hooff B, Schouten AP, Simonovski S. What one feels and what one knows: The influence of emotions on attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing. J Knowl Manag. 2012;16(1):148-58. doi: 10.1108/13673271211198990.
  • 20. Papadopoulos T, Stamati T, Nopparuch P. Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. Int J Inform Manage. 2013;33(1):133-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.08.002.
  • 21. Siang JJ, Santoso HB. Students'perspective of learning management system: An empirical evidence of technology acceptance model in emerging countries. Res World. 2015;6(2):1.
  • 22. Teo T. Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Comput Educ. 2011;57(4):2432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
  • 23. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
  • 24. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27(3):425. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
  • 25. Mehdipour Y, Ebrahimi S, Alipour J, Karimi A, Tabatabei F. [Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in healthcare setting]. J Health Biomed Inf. 2016;3(2):92-9. Persian.
  • 26. Kahrizsangi P, Rahimi Q, Zamani Nukabadi A. [A study of determinant factors of new information technology acceptance in sport and youth general office in Isfahan province based on TAM model]. Sport Manag. 2017;9(1):115-27. Persian.
  • 27. Ajam AA, Badnava S, Sabery R, Zabihi Hesary NK. [Anticipation of e-learning acceptance through nursing student's enthusiasm scale at Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2015]. J Med Educ Dev. 2017;11(4):330-9. Persian.
  • 28. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186-204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
  • 29. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley; 1989.
  • 30. Doloi H, Iyer KC, Sawhney A. Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor's performance on project success. Int J Proj Manag. 2011;29(6):687-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007.
  • 31. Singh R. Does my structural model represent the real phenomenon?: A review of the appropriate use of structural equation modelling (SEM) model fit indices. Market Rev. 2009;9(3):199-212. doi: 10.1362/146934709x467767.
  • 32. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Market Sci. 2011;40(3):414-33. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.
  • 33. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci. 2011;40(1):8-34. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x.
  • 34. Chinda T, Mohamed S. Structural equation model of construction safety culture. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2008;15(2):114-31. doi: 10.1108/09699980810852655.
  • 35. Marsh HW, Hau K, Grayson D. Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In: Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle JJ, editors. Contemporary psychometrics. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub; 2005. p. 275-340.
  • 36. Hernández B, Jiménez J, Martín MJ. Extending the technology acceptance model to include the IT decision-maker: A study of business management software. Technovation. 2008;28(3):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.002.
  • 37. Mastari Farahani F, Rezaei Sharif A, Ostadhasanloo H. [Obstacles of using information and communication technology in learning-teaching process]. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2012;5(1):15-21. Persian.
  • 38. Shoaei F, Alavi T. [The factors influencing technology acceptance among library users in technology faculties at Tehran's governmental universities]. Libr Inf Sci. 2007;10(3):9-34. Persian.
  • 39. Mirasadollah Lajrod L, Alipour Darvish Z. [Organizational factors affecting knowledge sharing within group (case study: Offices of the Central Building of BSI)]. Educ Res J. 2014;1(29):62-78. Persian.
  • 40. Gunawan S, Shieh CJ. A study on the effects of knowledge share in virtual community on creative teaching behaviors and teacher efficacy. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech Educ. 2016;12(4):1101-13. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1553a.
  • 41. Zaqout F, Abbas M. Towards a model for understanding the influence of the factors that stimulate university students' engagement and performance in knowledge sharing. Libr Rev. 2012;61(5):345-61. doi: 10.1108/00242531211280478.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments