Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

The Role of Technology Acceptance in Predicting Knowledge Sharing Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Ghasem Salimi 1 , * , Mehdi Mohamaddi 1 , Mahboubeh Mehrvarz 1 and Kamal Hashemi 1
Authors Information
1 Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: 15 (1); e87036
  • Published Online: January 28, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 15, 2017
  • Revised: November 15, 2017
  • Accepted: November 20, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.87036

To Cite: Salimi G, Mohamaddi M, Mehrvarz M , Hashemi K. The Role of Technology Acceptance in Predicting Knowledge Sharing Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Strides Dev Med Educ. Online ahead of Print ; 15(1):e87036. doi: 10.5812/sdme.87036.

Copyright © 2019, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Koushazade SA, Omidianpoor S, Zohurian M. The impact of organizational factors on the effectiveness of knowledge management among nurses. Int J Hospital Res. 2015;4(3):129-35.
  • 2. Sohail MS, Daud S. Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: Perspectives from Malaysia. Vine. 2009;39(2):125-42.
  • 3. Sa’adati Azar A, Nasiri MJ, Nasiri S. Knowledge sharing: The key factors in the success of knowledge management system in the organizational health of the employees working in the public universities of Tehran. Manag Issue Healthcare Sys. 2016;2:34-42. doi: 10.19259/mihs.2016.01.04.
  • 4. Shaheen M, Panchapakesan Kumari C. Role of knowledge sharing in the learning process. Literacy Inf Comput Educ J. 2013;Special 2(1):1292-8. doi: 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0171.
  • 5. Liao C, Wang HY, Chuang SH, Shih ML, Liu CC. Enhancing knowledge management for RD innovation and firm performance: An integrative view. Afr J Bus Manag. 2010;4(14):3026-38.
  • 6. Chin Wei C, Siong Choy C, Geok Chew G, Yee Yen Y. Knowledge sharing patterns of undergraduate students. Libr Rev. 2012;61(5):327-44. doi: 10.1108/00242531211280469.
  • 7. Kim D. The effects of knowledge sharing on program performance: Influences on CPS program performance [dissertation]. Virginia Tech; 2011.
  • 8. Chong CW, Teh PL, Tan BC. Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: Do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter? Educ Stud. 2013;40(1):1-25. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2013.825577.
  • 9. Meddour H, Abdul Majid AM, Yusoff RZ. The impact of information technology and networks on knowledge transfer and sharing: The mediating role of trust. World J Manag Behav Stud. 2016;4(1):31-40. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wjmbs.2016.4.1.1326.
  • 10. Zhang X, Chen Z, Vogel D, Yuan M, Guo C. Knowledge-sharing reward dynamics in knowledge management systems: Game theory-based empirical validation. Hum Factor Ergon Man. 2010;20(2):103-22. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20203.
  • 11. Zhang X, de Pablos PO, Xu Q. Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.021.
  • 12. Al-Hawamdeh S. Knowledge management: Cultivating knowledge professionals. Oxford: Chandos Pub; 2003. doi: 10.1533/9781780631936.
  • 13. Razmerita L, Kirchner K, Nielsen P. What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication. J Knowl Manag. 2016;20(6):1225-46. doi: 10.1108/jkm-03-2016-0112.
  • 14. Riege A. Three‐dozen knowledge‐sharing barriers managers must consider. J Knowl Manag. 2005;9(3):18-35. doi: 10.1108/13673270510602746.
  • 15. Ong HB, Yeap PF, Tan SH, Chong LL. Factors influencing knowledge sharing among undergraduate students. Ind High Educ. 2011;25(2):133-40. doi: 10.5367/ihe.2011.0035.
  • 16. Hussein ARH, Nassuora AB. Jordanian student's attitudes and perceptions towards knowledge sharing in institutions of higher education. Int J Acad Res. 2011;3(4):401-5.
  • 17. Majid S, Chitra PK. Role of knowledge sharing in the learning process. Literacy Inf Comput Educ J. 2013;Special 2(1):1292-8. doi: 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0171.
  • 18. Fullwood R, Rowley J, Delbridge R. Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. J Knowl Manag. 2013;17(1):123-36. doi: 10.1108/13673271311300831.
  • 19. van den Hooff B, Schouten AP, Simonovski S. What one feels and what one knows: The influence of emotions on attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing. J Knowl Manag. 2012;16(1):148-58. doi: 10.1108/13673271211198990.
  • 20. Papadopoulos T, Stamati T, Nopparuch P. Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. Int J Inform Manage. 2013;33(1):133-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.08.002.
  • 21. Siang JJ, Santoso HB. Students'perspective of learning management system: An empirical evidence of technology acceptance model in emerging countries. Res World. 2015;6(2):1.
  • 22. Teo T. Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Comput Educ. 2011;57(4):2432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
  • 23. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
  • 24. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27(3):425. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
  • 25. Mehdipour Y, Ebrahimi S, Alipour J, Karimi A, Tabatabei F. [Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in healthcare setting]. J Health Biomed Inf. 2016;3(2):92-9. Persian.
  • 26. Kahrizsangi P, Rahimi Q, Zamani Nukabadi A. [A study of determinant factors of new information technology acceptance in sport and youth general office in Isfahan province based on TAM model]. Sport Manag. 2017;9(1):115-27. Persian.
  • 27. Ajam AA, Badnava S, Sabery R, Zabihi Hesary NK. [Anticipation of e-learning acceptance through nursing student's enthusiasm scale at Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2015]. J Med Educ Dev. 2017;11(4):330-9. Persian.
  • 28. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186-204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.
  • 29. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley; 1989.
  • 30. Doloi H, Iyer KC, Sawhney A. Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor's performance on project success. Int J Proj Manag. 2011;29(6):687-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007.
  • 31. Singh R. Does my structural model represent the real phenomenon?: A review of the appropriate use of structural equation modelling (SEM) model fit indices. Market Rev. 2009;9(3):199-212. doi: 10.1362/146934709x467767.
  • 32. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Market Sci. 2011;40(3):414-33. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.
  • 33. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci. 2011;40(1):8-34. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x.
  • 34. Chinda T, Mohamed S. Structural equation model of construction safety culture. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2008;15(2):114-31. doi: 10.1108/09699980810852655.
  • 35. Marsh HW, Hau K, Grayson D. Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In: Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle JJ, editors. Contemporary psychometrics. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub; 2005. p. 275-340.
  • 36. Hernández B, Jiménez J, Martín MJ. Extending the technology acceptance model to include the IT decision-maker: A study of business management software. Technovation. 2008;28(3):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.002.
  • 37. Mastari Farahani F, Rezaei Sharif A, Ostadhasanloo H. [Obstacles of using information and communication technology in learning-teaching process]. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2012;5(1):15-21. Persian.
  • 38. Shoaei F, Alavi T. [The factors influencing technology acceptance among library users in technology faculties at Tehran's governmental universities]. Libr Inf Sci. 2007;10(3):9-34. Persian.
  • 39. Mirasadollah Lajrod L, Alipour Darvish Z. [Organizational factors affecting knowledge sharing within group (case study: Offices of the Central Building of BSI)]. Educ Res J. 2014;1(29):62-78. Persian.
  • 40. Gunawan S, Shieh CJ. A study on the effects of knowledge share in virtual community on creative teaching behaviors and teacher efficacy. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech Educ. 2016;12(4):1101-13. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1553a.
  • 41. Zaqout F, Abbas M. Towards a model for understanding the influence of the factors that stimulate university students' engagement and performance in knowledge sharing. Libr Rev. 2012;61(5):345-61. doi: 10.1108/00242531211280478.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments