Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

Influence of Flipped Classroom Method on Nursing Students’ Learning Approaches

Shadi Dehghanzadeh 1 , *
Author Information
1 Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: December 31, 2018, 15 (1); e81900
  • Published Online: January 29, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 9, 2018
  • Revised: November 12, 2018
  • Accepted: November 17, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.81900

To Cite: Dehghanzadeh S. Influence of Flipped Classroom Method on Nursing Students’ Learning Approaches, Strides Dev Med Educ. 2018 ; 15(1):e81900. doi: 10.5812/sdme.81900.

Copyright © 2019, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Benner P. Rethinking clinical and classroom teaching and learning. Educating Nurses; 2017, [cited 2018 Jun 30]. Available from:
  • 2. Docherty A, Warkentin P, Borgen J, Garthe K, Fischer KL, Najjar RH. Enhancing student engagement: Innovative strategies for intentional learning. J Prof Nurs. 2018;34(6):470-4. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.001. [PubMed: 30527695].
  • 3. Poikela P, Ruokamo H, Teras M. Comparison of meaningful learning characteristics in simulated nursing practice after traditional versus computer-based simulation method: A qualitative videography study. Nurs Educ Today. 2015;35(2):373-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.009. [PubMed: 25456257].
  • 4. Karns DS. Meaningful learning development in student nurses: the traditional nursing care plan versus the concept map care plan approach [dissertations]. Colorado: University of Northern Colorado; 2010.
  • 5. Kantar LD. Assessment and instruction to promote higher order thinking in nursing students. Nurs Educ Today. 2014;34(5):789-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.013. [PubMed: 24035312].
  • 6. Tricio JA, Montt JE, Ormeno AP, Del Real AJ, Naranjo CA. Impact of faculty development workshops in student-centered teaching methodologies on faculty members' teaching and their students' perceptions. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(6):675-84. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.014. [PubMed: 28572413].
  • 7. Billings DM. Flipping' the classroom. Am J Nurs. 2016;116(9):52-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000494696.86240.35. [PubMed: 27560340].
  • 8. Bristol T. Flipping the classroom. Teach Learn Nurs. 2014;9(1):43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2013.11.002.
  • 9. Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, Cross M. The evidence for 'flipping out': A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurs Educ Today. 2016;38:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010. [PubMed: 26804940].
  • 10. Jafaraghaie F, Dehghanzadeh S, Khordadi-Astane H. [Nursing students' experience in a flipped classroom method]. Res Med Educ. 2017;9(1):36-27. Persian. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.rme.9.1.36.
  • 11. Mudd SS, Silbert-Flagg JA. Implementing the flipped classroom to enhance nurse practitioner clinical decision-making in the care of the pediatric asthma patient. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016;37(6):352-3. doi: 10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000083.
  • 12. Dehghanzadeh S, Jafaraghaie F, Khordadi Astane H. [The effect of flipped classroom on critical thinking disposition in nursing students]. Iran J Med Educ. 2018;18(6):39-48. Persian.
  • 13. Hanson J. Surveying the experiences and perceptions of undergraduate nursing students of a flipped classroom approach to increase understanding of drug science and its application to clinical practice. Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;16(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.09.001. [PubMed: 26494304].
  • 14. Roca J, Reguant M, Canet O. Learning outcomes of "The Oncology Patient" study among nursing students: A comparison of teaching strategies. Nurs Educ Today. 2016;46:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.018. [PubMed: 27589605].
  • 15. Ausubel DP. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Oxford, England: Grune and Stratton, Inc; 1963.
  • 16. Cavallo AML, Potter WH, Rozman M. Gender differences in learning constructs, shifts in learning constructs, and their relationship to course achievement in a structured inquiry, yearlong college physics course for life science majors. School Sci Math. 2004;104(6):288-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18000.x.
  • 17. Gurcay D. Investigation of the pre-service physics teachers' learning approaches. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;106:1614-21. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.182.
  • 18. Dreifuerst KT. Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clinic Simulat Nurs. 2015;11(5):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005.
  • 19. Hasnor HN, Ahmad Z, Nordin N. The relationship between learning approaches and academic achievement among intec students, Uitm Shah Alam. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;90:178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.080.
  • 20. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001;71(Pt 1):133-49. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433. [PubMed: 11307705].
  • 21. Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process. British J Educ Psychol. 1976;46(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
  • 22. Mehdinezhad V, Esmaeeli R. [Students' approaches to learning superficial, strategic and deep]. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2015;8(2):83-9. Persian.
  • 23. Gordon C, Debus R. Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. Br J Educ Psychol. 2002;72(Pt 4):483-511. doi: 10.1348/00070990260377488. [PubMed: 12495563].
  • 24. Biggs JB. Study process questionnaire manual. Student approaches to learning and studying. ERIC; 1987.
  • 25. Henoch I, Jakobsson Ung E, Ozanne A, Falk H, Falk K, Kenne Sarenmalm E, et al. Nursing students' experiences of involvement in clinical research: An exploratory study. Nurs Educ Pract. 2014;14(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.009. [PubMed: 23953011].
  • 26. Leung SF, Mok E, Wong D. The impact of assessment methods on the learning of nursing students. Nurs Educ Today. 2008;28(6):711-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.11.004. [PubMed: 18164105].
  • 27. Shokri O, Kadivar P, Farzad V, Daneshvarpoor Z. [Relationship of thinking styles and learning approaches with academic achievment]. Adv Cogn Sci. 2006;8(2):44-52. Persian.
  • 28. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236-43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086. [PubMed: 24270916].
  • 29. Raihanah MM. Flipped classroom & meaningful learning among UKM graduates students: A teacher's reflection. In: Embi MA, editor. Blended and flipped learning: Case studies in Malaysian HEIS. Malaysia: Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2014.
  • 30. Mikkelsen TR. Nursing students’ experiences, perceptions and behavior in a flipped-classroom anatomy and physiology course. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2015;5(10). doi: 10.5430/jnep.v5n10p28.
  • 31. Lacher LL, Lewis MC. The effectiveness of video quizzes in a flipped class. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2015 Mar 4-7; Kansas city, USA. 2015. p. 20-3.
  • 32. Khanova J, Roth MT, Rodgers JE, McLaughlin JE. Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Med Educ. 2015;49(10):1038-48. doi: 10.1111/medu.12807. [PubMed: 26383075].
  • 33. Snelgrove SR. Approaches to learning of student nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(8):605-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.07.006. [PubMed: 15519443].
  • 34. Rosander P, Bäckström M. The unique contribution of learning approaches to academic performance, after controlling for IQ and personality: Are there gender differences? Learn Indiv Differences. 2012;22(6):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.011.
  • 35. Salamonson Y, Ramjan LM, van den Nieuwenhuizen S, Metcalfe L, Chang S, Everett B. Sense of coherence, self-regulated learning and academic performance in first year nursing students: A cluster analysis approach. Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;17:208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.01.001. [PubMed: 26804936].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments