Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

Improvement of the Quality of Basic Clinical Skills Training and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): An Action Research with a Mixed Method

Esmat Nouhi 1 , * , Sakineh Sabzevari 2 and Hakime Hosainrezaee 3
Authors Information
1 Medical and Nursing Education, Nursing Research Center, Physiologic Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2 Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Razi Nursing Faculty , Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3 Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: 15 (1); e64982
  • Published Online: January 29, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 10, 2017
  • Revised: July 25, 2018
  • Accepted: July 29, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.64982

To Cite: Nouhi E, Sabzevari S, Hosainrezaee H. Improvement of the Quality of Basic Clinical Skills Training and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): An Action Research with a Mixed Method, Strides Dev Med Educ. Online ahead of Print ; 15(1):e64982. doi: 10.5812/sdme.64982.

Copyright © 2019, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Sallis E. Total quality management in education. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2014. 180 p.
  • 2. Shoghi Shafagh Aria F, Dorrani K, Lameei A, Labbaf Ghasemi R. [Approaches of iranian medical universities to quality management in education]. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(4):350-6. Persian.
  • 3. Allami A, Sarreshtehdari M, derakhshan F, safdari F. [Innovation in medical education based on quality management model: An experiment in medical school, Ghazvin University of Medical Sciences]. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(3):291-3. Persian.
  • 4. Asadizaker M, Abed Saeedi Z, Abedi HA. [Development of clinical teaching process of the fundamentals of nursing with participatory approach: An action research]. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2014;3(2):175-89. Persian.
  • 5. Hoyles A, Pollard C, Lees S, Glossop D. Nursing students' early exposure to clinical practice: An innovation in curriculum development. Nurse Educ Today. 2000;20(6):490-8. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0444. [PubMed: 10959138].
  • 6. Hamidi Y, Tabibi SJ. [A study of TQM implementation outcomes in Hamadan Province, district health systems 2000-2002]. J Hamadan Univ Med Sci. 2004;11(1):37-43. Persian.
  • 7. Young LE, Paterson BL. Teaching nursing: Developing a student-centered learning environment. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
  • 8. Quinn FM. The principles and practice of nurse education. 4th ed. London: NelsonThornes; 2000.
  • 9. Kanji G. Total quality management: Proceedings of the first world congress. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0539-2.
  • 10. Schuring RW, Luijten H. Reinventing suggestion systems for continuous improvement. Int J Tech Manag. 2001;22(4). doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2001.002969.
  • 11. Davis AH, Kimble LP. Human patient simulation evaluation rubrics for nursing education: Measuring the essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(11):605-11. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110715-01. [PubMed: 21751764].
  • 12. Baxter P. The CCARE model of clinical supervision: Bridging the theory-practice gap. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007;7(2):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.06.007. [PubMed: 17689431].
  • 13. Corlett J. The perceptions of nurse teachers, student nurses and preceptors of the theory-practice gap in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today. 2000;20(6):499-505. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0414. [PubMed: 10959139].
  • 14. Soh KL, Davidson PM, Leslie G, Bin Abdul Rahman A. Action research studies in the intensive care setting: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.014. [PubMed: 21030021].
  • 15. Noohi E, Motesadi M, Haghdoost A. [Clinical teachers 'view points to wards objective structured clinical examination in Kerman University of Medical Science]. Iran J Med Educ. 2008;8(1):113-20. Persian.
  • 16. Humani Magd Abadi F, Jalalmanesh Sh, Salahshoorian Fard A, Haghani H. [A comparative study of two OSCE clinical evaluation techniques and gradingin one hospital affiliated to Arak University of Medical Sciences]. Teb va Tazkiye. 2005;14(2):24-9. Persian.
  • 17. Jalili Z, Nouhi E, Ahmadpour B. [Investigation of medical stagers and interns satisfaction on OSCE as a clinical skill evaluation method in Kerman University of Medical Sciences]. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2005;2(1):18-24. Persian.
  • 18. Martinez-Lorente AR, Sánchez-Rodriguez C, Dewhurst FW. The effect of information technologies on TQM: An initial analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 2004;89(1):77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.06.001.
  • 19. Dehghan Nayeri N. Nursing Management Principles. Tehran: Bashari; 2009.
  • 20. Lamie A. Comprehensive quality management. Principles of use and lessons from an experience. Tehran: Modernmedicine; 2003.
  • 21. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  • 22. Mortazavi H, Mohammadnejad E, Tabatabaee A. [Actionresearch: A way fornursing development in future]. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2014;6(1):215-21. Persian.
  • 23. Boyer MJ. Brunnerand suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
  • 24. Black JM, Hawks JH. Medical-surgical nursing: Clinical management for positive outcomes. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
  • 25. Lynn P, LeBon M. Skill check lists for taylor's clinical nursing skills: A nursing process approach. 3rd ed. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer; 2011.
  • 26. Alinier G. Nursing students’ and lecturers’ perspectives of objective structured clinical examination incorporating simulation. Nurse EducToday. 2003;23(6):419-26. doi: 10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00044-3.
  • 27. Furlong E, Fox P, Lavin M, Collins R. Oncology nursing students' views of a modified OSCE. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9(4):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.03.001. [PubMed: 16027036].
  • 28. Newble D. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: Objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. 2004;38(2):199-203. [PubMed: 14871390].
  • 29. Reza Masouleh S, Zare A, Chehrzad M, Atr Kar Ruoshan Z. [Comparing two methods of evaluation, objective structured practical examination and traditional examination, on the satisfaction of students in Shahid Beheshti Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery]. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2008;18(1):22-30. Persian.
  • 30. Hoseini BL, Mazloum SR, Jafarnejad F, Foroughipour M. Comparison of midwifery students' satisfaction with direct observation of procedural skills and current methods in evaluation of procedural skills in Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(2):94-100. [PubMed: 23983736]. [PubMed Central: PMC3748577].
  • 31. Chehrzad MM, Mirzaei M, Kazemnejad E. [Comparison between two methods: Objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) and traditional on nursing students’ satisfaction]. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2004;13(50):8-13. Persian.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments