Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Medical Education Fellowship Program for the Faculty Members of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Based on the Kirkpatrick Model

Mahmoud Reza Dehghani 1 , Mahla Salajegheh 2 , 3 , * , Majid Fasihi Harandi 4 , Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy 5 , Bahareh Bahman Bijari 6 , Zeynab Shakiba 7 and Zahra Fatahi 1
Authors Information
1 Medical Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2 Medical Education Department, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3 Medical Education Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Medical Education Department, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
5 Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
6 School of Medicine, Physiology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
7 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: 15 (1); e64668
  • Published Online: February 23, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 2, 2017
  • Revised: September 29, 2018
  • Accepted: September 30, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.64668

To Cite: Dehghani M R , Salajegheh M, Fasihi Harandi M, Bahaadinbeigy K, Bahman Bijari B, et al. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Medical Education Fellowship Program for the Faculty Members of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Based on the Kirkpatrick Model, Strides Dev Med Educ. Online ahead of Print ; 15(1):e64668. doi: 10.5812/sdme.64668.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Leslie K, Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Esdaile M, Reeves S. Advancing faculty development in medical education: A systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(7):1038-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd29. [PubMed: 23702523].
  • 2. Steinert Y. Faculty development in the new millennium: Key challenges and future directions. Med Teach. 2009;22(1):44-50. doi: 10.1080/01421590078814.
  • 3. Wilkerson L, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998;73(4):387-96. [PubMed: 9580715].
  • 4. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28(6):497-526. doi: 10.1080/01421590600902976. [PubMed: 17074699].
  • 5. Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME guide No. 40. Med Teach. 2016;38(8):769-86. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851. [PubMed: 27420193].
  • 6. O'Sullivan PS, Irby DM. Reframing research on faculty development. Acad Med. 2011;86(4):421-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058. [PubMed: 21346505].
  • 7. Steinert Y. Staff development for clinical teachers. Clin Teach. 2005;2(2):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2005.00062.x.
  • 8. Sorinola OO, Thistlethwaite J. A systematic review of faculty development activities in family medicine. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):e1309-18. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.770132. [PubMed: 23464818].
  • 9. Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell L. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: From programme design to curriculum change. Med Educ. 2005;39(2):127-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02069.x. [PubMed: 15679679].
  • 10. McLeod PJ, Steinert Y, Nasmith L, Conochie L. Faculty development in Canadian medical schools: A 10-year update. CMAJ. 1997;156(10):1419-23. [PubMed: 9164401]. [PubMed Central: PMC1227411].
  • 11. Steinert Y, Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Fuks A. Faculty development as an instrument of change: A case study on teaching professionalism. Acad Med. 2007;82(11):1057-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000285346.87708.67. [PubMed: 17971692].
  • 12. Dent J, Harden R. A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2013.
  • 13. Gillespie M. Student-teacher connection: A place of possibility. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(2):211-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03581.x. [PubMed: 16164482].
  • 14. Rajeev P, Madan MS, Jayarajan K. Revisiting Kirkpatrick's model–an evaluation of an academic training. Current Sci. 2009;96(2).
  • 15. Hewson MG, Copeland HL, Fishleder AJ. What's the use of faculty development? Program evaluation using retrospective self-assessments and independent performance ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13(3):153-60. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1303_4. [PubMed: 11475658].
  • 16. Ramalanjaona G. Faculty development: How to evaluate the effectiveness of a faculty development program in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(8):891-2. [PubMed: 12896893].
  • 17. Elliot DL, Skeff KM, Stratos GA. How do you get to the improvement of teaching? A longitudinal faculty development program for medical. Teach Learn Med. 1999;11(1):52-7. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1101_12.
  • 18. Knight AM, Cole KA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Kolodner K, Wright SM. Long-term follow-up of a longitudinal faculty development program in teaching skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):721-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0145.x. [PubMed: 16050881]. [PubMed Central: PMC1490179].
  • 19. McLean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk JM. Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach. 2008;30(6):555-84. doi: 10.1080/01421590802109834. [PubMed: 18677659].
  • 20. Nasmith L, Steinert Y. The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive lecturing. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13(1):43-8. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1301_8. [PubMed: 11273379].
  • 21. Rust G, Taylor V, Herbert-Carter J, Smith QT, Earles K, Kondwani K. The morehouse faculty development program: Evolving methods and 10-year outcomes. Fam Med. 2006;38(1):43-9. [PubMed: 16378258].
  • 22. Kollisch D, Linsey S, Weiss JE. Using residents' ratings of teaching to assess the effectiveness of faculty development. Acad Med. 2000;75(5):558-9. [PubMed: 10824844].
  • 23. Gelula MH, Yudkowsky R. Using standardised students in faculty development workshops to improve clinical teaching skills. Med Educ. 2003;37(7):621-9. [PubMed: 12834420].
  • 24. Berbano EP, Browning R, Pangaro L, Jackson JL. The impact of the stanford faculty development program on ambulatory teaching behavior. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):430-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00422.x. [PubMed: 16704383]. [PubMed Central: PMC1484783].
  • 25. Tax CL, Doucette H, Neish NR, Maillet JP. A model for cultivating dental hygiene faculty development within a community of practice. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(3):311-21. [PubMed: 22383599].
  • 26. Behar-Horenstein LS, Childs GS, Graff RA. Observation and assessment of faculty development learning outcomes. J Dent Educ. 2010;74(11):1245-54. [PubMed: 21045231].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments