Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

The Perceptions of Patients and Their Families About a Good Physician: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Soleiman Ahmady 1 , Hamed Khani 1 , * and Zohrehsadat Mirmoghtadaie 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of E-learning in Medical Education, Virtual School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: December 31, 2018, 15 (1); e62391
  • Published Online: December 18, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 2, 2017
  • Revised: April 21, 2018
  • Accepted: April 22, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.62391

To Cite: Ahmady S , Khani H, Mirmoghtadaie Z . The Perceptions of Patients and Their Families About a Good Physician: A Qualitative Content Analysis, Strides Dev Med Educ. 2018 ; 15(1):e62391. doi: 10.5812/sdme.62391.

Copyright © 2018, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results and Discussion
  • 1. Gale-Grant O, Gatter M, Abel P. Developing ideas of professionalism. Clin Teach. 2013;10(3):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00643.x. [PubMed: 23656678].
  • 2. Van De Camp K, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Grol RP, Bottema BJ. How to conceptualize professionalism: A qualitative study. Med Teach. 2004;26(8):696-702. doi: 10.1080/01421590400019518. [PubMed: 15763872].
  • 3. Garfield JM, Garfield FB, Hevelone ND, Bhattacharyya N, Dedrick DF, Ashley SW, et al. Doctors in acute and longitudinal care specialties emphasise different professional attributes: Implications for training programmes. Med Educ. 2009;43(8):749-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03411.x. [PubMed: 19659488].
  • 4. Dent J, Harden RM. A practical guide for medical teachers. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009.
  • 5. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 2013. Available from:
  • 6. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Teaching medical professionalism: Supporting the development of a professional identity. 2nd ed. Cambridg, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316178485.
  • 7. Rabow MW, Remen RN, Parmelee DX, Inui TS. Professional formation: Extending medicine's lineage of service into the next century. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):310-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c887f7. [PubMed: 20107361].
  • 8. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 1:S16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x. [PubMed: 16405704]. [PubMed Central: PMC1484835].
  • 9. Martin S. What is a good doctor? Patient perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(4):752-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70486-7. [PubMed: 9579438].
  • 10. Bendapudi NM, Berry LL, Frey KA, Parish JT, Rayburn WL. Patients' perspectives on ideal physician behaviors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(3):338-44. doi: 10.4065/81.3.338. [PubMed: 16529138].
  • 11. Luthy C, Cedraschi C, Perrin E, Allaz AF. How do patients define "good" and "bad" doctors? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135(5-6):82-6. [PubMed: 15729612].
  • 12. Miratashi Yazdi SN, Nedjat S, Arbabi M, Majdzadeh R. Who is a good doctor? patients and physicians' perspectives. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):150-2. [PubMed: 26060792]. [PubMed Central: PMC4450008].
  • 13. Moein A, Seyed Mortaz S. [Good physicians from the perspective patients]. Eth sci Tech. 2014;9(1):1-9. Persian.
  • 14. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, et al. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: An international comparison. European task force on patient evaluations of general practice (europep). Fam Pract. 1999;16(1):4-11. [PubMed: 10321388].
  • 15. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. [PubMed: 18352969].
  • 16. Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM. Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth BM, editor. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. ABC-CLIO; 2016. 308 p.
  • 17. Hays DG, Singh AA. Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
  • 18. Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. J Mix Method Res. 2007;1(1):77-100. doi: 10.1177/1558689806292430.
  • 19. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC. Qualitative communication research methods. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2011.
  • 20. Cuesta-Briand B, Auret K, Johnson P, Playford D. 'A world of difference': A qualitative study of medical students' views on professionalism and the 'good doctor'. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:77. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-77. [PubMed: 24725303]. [PubMed Central: PMC3992127].
  • 21. Lambe P, Bristow D. What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors? A Delphi survey of clinicians. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):e347-54. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490603. [PubMed: 20662569].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments