Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

The Perceptions of Patients and Their Families About a Good Physician: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Soleiman Ahmady 1 , Hamed Khani 1 , * and Zohrehsadat Mirmoghtadaie 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of E-learning in Medical Education, Virtual School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: December 31, 2018, 15 (1); e62391
  • Published Online: December 18, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 2, 2017
  • Revised: April 21, 2018
  • Accepted: April 22, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.62391

To Cite: Ahmady S , Khani H, Mirmoghtadaie Z . The Perceptions of Patients and Their Families About a Good Physician: A Qualitative Content Analysis, Strides Dev Med Educ. 2018 ; 15(1):e62391. doi: 10.5812/sdme.62391.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results and Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Gale-Grant O, Gatter M, Abel P. Developing ideas of professionalism. Clin Teach. 2013;10(3):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00643.x. [PubMed: 23656678].
  • 2. Van De Camp K, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Grol RP, Bottema BJ. How to conceptualize professionalism: A qualitative study. Med Teach. 2004;26(8):696-702. doi: 10.1080/01421590400019518. [PubMed: 15763872].
  • 3. Garfield JM, Garfield FB, Hevelone ND, Bhattacharyya N, Dedrick DF, Ashley SW, et al. Doctors in acute and longitudinal care specialties emphasise different professional attributes: Implications for training programmes. Med Educ. 2009;43(8):749-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03411.x. [PubMed: 19659488].
  • 4. Dent J, Harden RM. A practical guide for medical teachers. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009.
  • 5. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 2013. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Good_medical_practice___English_1215.pdf_51527435.pdf.
  • 6. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Teaching medical professionalism: Supporting the development of a professional identity. 2nd ed. Cambridg, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316178485.
  • 7. Rabow MW, Remen RN, Parmelee DX, Inui TS. Professional formation: Extending medicine's lineage of service into the next century. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):310-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c887f7. [PubMed: 20107361].
  • 8. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 1:S16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x. [PubMed: 16405704]. [PubMed Central: PMC1484835].
  • 9. Martin S. What is a good doctor? Patient perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(4):752-4. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70486-7. [PubMed: 9579438].
  • 10. Bendapudi NM, Berry LL, Frey KA, Parish JT, Rayburn WL. Patients' perspectives on ideal physician behaviors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(3):338-44. doi: 10.4065/81.3.338. [PubMed: 16529138].
  • 11. Luthy C, Cedraschi C, Perrin E, Allaz AF. How do patients define "good" and "bad" doctors? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135(5-6):82-6. [PubMed: 15729612].
  • 12. Miratashi Yazdi SN, Nedjat S, Arbabi M, Majdzadeh R. Who is a good doctor? patients and physicians' perspectives. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):150-2. [PubMed: 26060792]. [PubMed Central: PMC4450008].
  • 13. Moein A, Seyed Mortaz S. [Good physicians from the perspective patients]. Eth sci Tech. 2014;9(1):1-9. Persian.
  • 14. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, et al. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: An international comparison. European task force on patient evaluations of general practice (europep). Fam Pract. 1999;16(1):4-11. [PubMed: 10321388].
  • 15. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. [PubMed: 18352969].
  • 16. Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM. Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth BM, editor. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. ABC-CLIO; 2016. 308 p.
  • 17. Hays DG, Singh AA. Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
  • 18. Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. J Mix Method Res. 2007;1(1):77-100. doi: 10.1177/1558689806292430.
  • 19. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC. Qualitative communication research methods. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2011.
  • 20. Cuesta-Briand B, Auret K, Johnson P, Playford D. 'A world of difference': A qualitative study of medical students' views on professionalism and the 'good doctor'. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:77. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-77. [PubMed: 24725303]. [PubMed Central: PMC3992127].
  • 21. Lambe P, Bristow D. What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors? A Delphi survey of clinicians. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):e347-54. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490603. [PubMed: 20662569].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments