Developing Comprehensive Course Evaluation Guidelines: A Step towards Organizing Program Evaluation Activities in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

AUTHORS

Azim Mirzazadeh 1 , * , Roghayeh Gandomkar 2 , Leyla Sadighpour 3 , Mohammad Jalili 4 , Mojgan Safari 5 , Batool Amini 6

1 Ph.D. Student in Medical Education, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran

2 Specialist in Internal Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran

3 Prosthodontist, Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran

4 Specialist in Emergency Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran

5 Education Studies and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran

6 General Practitioner, Education Studies and Development Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran

How to Cite: Mirzazadeh A, Gandomkar R , Sadighpour L , Jalili M, Safari M , et al. Developing Comprehensive Course Evaluation Guidelines: A Step towards Organizing Program Evaluation Activities in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Strides Dev Med Educ. 2015 ; 12(S1):e59434.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Strides in Development of Medical Education: 12 (S1); e59434
Published Online: March 28, 2015
Article Type: Research Article
Received: August 05, 2017
Accepted: January 14, 2015

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background & Objective: One of the potential strategies for ensuring the quality of educational programs is adopting a systematic approach to its evaluation. Current evidence indicates the lack of high quality program evaluation activities in the field of medical education. The aim of this study was to review the current status of program evaluation activities in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, and formulate guidelines to promote program evaluation activities at the University level.
Methods: A survey was conducted to investigate the current conditions of program evaluation using a questionnaire in 2012. Then, the comprehensive course evaluation guidelines, consisting of 22 items, were developed based on literature review, survey results, and experts’ opinions. Finally, each affiliated school developed its own evaluation plan. The evaluation taskforce reviewed evaluation plans using a checklist.
Results: Using one tool or resource, 9 schools (90%) conducted course evaluation at least once. The views of students, faculty, staff or alumni were used occasionally. Moreover, 4 schools (40%) reported the evaluation results. After reviewing 14 submitted course plans based on the checklist, 51 feedbacks were provided. Most and least feedbacks were related to evaluation design and implementation and evaluation infrastructure, respectively.
Conclusion: The process of developing guidelines and plans resulted in stakeholders reaching a common understanding of course evaluation, and in turn, creating evaluation capacity and more accountability.
 

Keywords

Program evaluation Ongoing evaluation Evaluation system Comprehensive evaluation

© 2015, Medical Education Development Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fulltext

Full text is available in pdf

References

  • 1.

    Reference is available in pdf

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: