Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

Using Alternative Names and Pictures to Facilitate Learning Afferent and Efferent Nervous System Connections

Hatef Ghasemihamidabadi 1 , Myamar Nazm Bojnordi 1 , Noorolah Rezaei 1 and Ali Delbari 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
2 Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Sabzever University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: May 2017, 14 (1); e59237
  • Published Online: May 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 28, 2016
  • Revised: October 22, 2016
  • Accepted: November 6, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.59237

To Cite: Ghasemihamidabadi H, Nazm Bojnordi M, Rezaei N, Delbari A. Using Alternative Names and Pictures to Facilitate Learning Afferent and Efferent Nervous System Connections, Strides Dev Med Educ. 2017 ; 14(1):e59237. doi: 10.5812/sdme.59237.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Plumley L, Armstrong R, De Ribaupierre S, Eagleson R. Spatial ability and training in virtual neuroanatomy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 184: 324-9[PubMed]
  • 2. Fisch A. Neuroanatomy: Draw it to Know it. 2009;
  • 3. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. Effects of review on medical students' recall of different types of neuroanatomical content. Acad Med. 2009; 84(10 Suppl)-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Kennedy S. Using case studies as a semester-long tool to teach neuroanatomy and structure-function relationships to undergraduates. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2013; 12(1)-22[PubMed]
  • 5. Deal AL, Erickson KJ, Bilsky EJ, Hillman SJ, Burman MA. K-12 Neuroscience Education Outreach Program: Interactive Activities for Educating Students about Neuroscience. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2014; 13(1)[PubMed]
  • 6. Kooloos JG, Schepens-Franke AN, Bergman EM, Donders RA, Vorstenbosch MA. Anatomical knowledge gain through a clay-modeling exercise compared to live and video observations. Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7(6): 420-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Estevez ME, Lindgren KA, Bergethon PR. A novel three-dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(6): 309-17[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Adams CM, Wilson TD. Virtual cerebral ventricular system: an MR-based three-dimensional computer model. Anat Sci Educ. 2011; 4(6): 340-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Kockro RA, Amaxopoulou C, Killeen T, Wagner W, Reisch R, Schwandt E, et al. Stereoscopic neuroanatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Ann Anat. 2015; 201: 91-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Gould DJ, Terrell MA, Fleming J. A usability study of users' perceptions toward a multimedia computer-assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2008; 1(4): 175-83[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Estes RI. Dual format course design: neuroanatomy and neurophysiology for adult learners. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2007; 6(1)-33[PubMed]
  • 12. Lamperti A, Sodicoff M. Computer‐based neuroanatomy laboratory for medical students. Anat Rec. 1997; 249(3): 422-8[DOI]
  • 13. Snell RS. Clinical neuroanatomy. 2010;
  • 14. Singh I. Textbook of human neuroanatomy. 2006;
  • 15. Arya R, Morrison T, Zumwalt A, Shaffer K. Making education effective and fun: stations-based approach to teaching radiology and anatomy to third-year medical students. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20(10): 1311-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Holland BK. Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anat Sci Educ. 2008; 1(1): 3-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Rehman R, Khan AN, Kamran A. Role of small group interactive sessions in two different curriculums based medical colleges. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62(9): 920-3[PubMed]
  • 18. Kamei RK, Cook S, Puthucheary J, Starmer CF. 21st century learning in medicine: Traditional teaching versus team-based learning. Med Sci Educ. 2014; 22(2): 57-64[DOI]
  • 19. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 1999; 69(1): 21-51[DOI]
  • 20. Schuh L, Burdette DE, Schultz L, Silver B. Learning clinical neurophysiology: gaming is better than lectures. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 25(3): 167-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Gauthier A, Corrin M, Jenkinson J. Exploring the influence of game design on learning and voluntary use in an online vascular anatomy study aid. Comput Educ. 2015; 87: 24-34[DOI]
  • 22. Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006; 30(1): 13-6[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments