Strides in Development of Medical Education

Published by: Kowsar

Evaluation of Passing Scores in Semiotics: An Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Medical Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, 2015

Abbas Makaren 1 , Hamid Mahdavifard 1 , * and Hasan Gholami 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Education, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
Article information
  • Strides in Development of Medical Education: May 2017, 14 (1); e59227
  • Published Online: May 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 7, 2016
  • Revised: March 14, 2017
  • Accepted: April 5, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/sdme.59227

To Cite: Makaren A, Mahdavifard H, Gholami H. Evaluation of Passing Scores in Semiotics: An Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Medical Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, 2015, Strides Dev Med Educ. 2017 ; 14(1):e59227. doi: 10.5812/sdme.59227.

Copyright © 2017, Strides in Development of Medical Education. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
  • 1. Mortaz Hejri S, Jalili M. Standard setting in medical education: fundamental concepts and emerging challenges. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014; 28: 34[PubMed]
  • 2. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979; 13(1): 41-54[PubMed]
  • 3. Cusimano MD. Standard setting in medical education. Acad Med. 1996; 71(10 Suppl)-20[PubMed]
  • 4. Wayne D, Cohen E. Standard Setting in Competency Evaluation. 2010;
  • 5. Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 2003; 37(5): 464-9[PubMed]
  • 6. Boulet JR, De Champlain AF, McKinley DW. Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations. Med Teach. 2003; 25(3): 245-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Boursicot KA, Roberts TE, Pell G. Using borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schools. Med Educ. 2007; 41(11): 1024-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Kane MT, Crooks TJ, Cohen AS. Designing and Evaluating Standard-Setting Procedures for Licensure and Certification Tests. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1999; 4(3): 195-207[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Schoonheim-Klein M, Muijtjens A, Habets L, Manogue M, van der Vleuten C, van der Velden U. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods. Eur J Dent Educ. 2009; 13(3): 162-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Ben-David MF. AMEE Guide No. 18: Standard setting in student assessment. Med Teach. 2009; 22(2): 120-30[DOI]
  • 11. Kaufman DM, Mann KV, Muijtjens AM, van der Vleuten CP. A comparison of standard-setting procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2000; 75(3): 267-71[PubMed]
  • 12. Plake BS, Hambleton RK, Jaeger RM. A New Standard-Setting Method for Performance Assessments: The Dominant Profile Judgment Method and Some Field-Test Results. Educ Psychol Measure. 2016; 57(3): 400-11[DOI]
  • 13. Ricker KL. Setting cut-scores: A critical review of the Angoff and modified Angoff methods. Alberta J Educ Res. 2006; 52(1): 53
  • 14. Maurer TJ, Alexander RA, Callahan CM, Bailey JJ, Dambrot FH. Methodological and Psychometric Issues in Setting Cutoff Scores Using the Angoff Method. Personnel Psychol. 2006; 44(2): 235-62[DOI]
  • 15. Kramer A, Muijtjens A, Jansen K, Dusman H, Tan L, van der Vleuten C. Comparison of a rational and an empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE. Objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. 2003; 37(2): 132-9[PubMed]
  • 16. Brandon PR. Conclusions About Frequently Studied Modified Angoff Standard-Setting Topics. Appl Measure Educ. 2004; 17(1): 59-88[DOI]
  • 17. Jalili M, Hejri SM, Norcini JJ. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method. Med Educ. 2011; 45(12): 1199-208[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Chinn RN, Hertz NR. Alternative Approaches to Standard Setting for Licensing and Certification Examinations. Appl Measure Educ. 2002; 15(1): 1-14[DOI]
  • 19. Troncon LE. Clinical skills assessment: limitations to the introduction of an "OSCE" (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) in a traditional Brazilian medical school. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004; 122(1): 12-7[PubMed]
  • 20. Wilkinson TJ, Newble DI, Frampton CM. Standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination: use of global ratings of borderline performance to determine the passing score. Med Educ. 2001; 35(11): 1043-9[PubMed]
  • 21. Davison I, Bullock AD. Evaluation of the Introduction of the Objective Structured Public Health Examination. 2007;
  • 22. Smee SM, Blackmore DE. Setting standards for an objective structured clinical examination: the borderline group method gains ground on Angoff. Med Educ. 2001; 35(11): 1009-10[PubMed]
  • 23. Humphrey-Murto S, MacFadyen JC. Standard setting: a comparison of case-author and modified borderline-group methods in a small-scale OSCE. Acad Med. 2002; 77(7): 729-32[PubMed]
  • 24. Wood TJ, Humphrey-Murto SM, Norman GR. Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006; 11(2): 115-22[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Bandaranayake RC. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37. Med Teach. 2008; 30(9-10): 836-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Searle J. Defining competency - the role of standard setting. Med Educ. 2000; 34(5): 363-6[PubMed]
  • 27. Jalili M, Mortazhejri S. Standard Setting for Objective Structured Clinical Exam Using Four Methods: Pre-fixed score, Angoff, Borderline Regression and Cohen’s. Strid Dev Med Educ. 2012; 9(1): 77-84
  • 28. Cizek GJ. Standard-Setting Guidelines. Educ Measure Issues Pract. 2005; 15(1): 13-21[DOI]
  • 29. Bay L. Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests by Cizek, GJ, & Bunch, MB. 2010;
  • 30. Reid K, Dodds A. Comparing the borderline group and borderline regression approaches to setting Objective Structured Clinical Examination cut scores. J Contemp Med Educ. 2014; 2(1): 8[DOI]
  • 31. Barman A. Standard setting in student assessment: is a defensible method yet to come? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008; 37(11): 957-63[PubMed]
  • 32. Taylor CA. Development of a modified Cohen method of standard setting. Med Teach. 2011; 33(12)-82[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments