Evaluation of Multiple Choice Questions in the School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, the First Semester of 2007

AUTHORS

Mohammadreza Haghshenas 1 , Kourosh Vahidshahi 1 , * , Mitra Mahmudi 1 , Leyla Shahbaznejad 1 , Nikoo Parvinnejad 1 , Aazam Emadi 1

1 Iran

How to Cite: Haghshenas M , Vahidshahi K, Mahmudi M , Shahbaznejad L , Parvinnejad N , et al. Evaluation of Multiple Choice Questions in the School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, the First Semester of 2007, Strides Dev Med Educ. 2009 ; 5(2):e58729.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Strides in Development of Medical Education: 5 (2); e58729
Published Online: January 20, 2009
Article Type: Research Article
Received: July 25, 2017
Accepted: November 27, 2008

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background & Objective: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are the commonest form of exams
in medical education which are highly reliable; however their structural and content validity,
taxonomy and structural principles have always been considered by researchers. This study was
designed to evaluate quality of MCQs in the school medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical
Sciences, regarding taxonomy and structural principles.
Methods: In this descriptive study, all MCQs of written exams held during a whole semester in the
school of medical in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences were evaluated. All questions
were assessed according to taxonomy (in three levels of recall, comprehension, and application) and
structure using a checklist which was based on Millman’s principles for designing stem and choices
of questions.
Results: Among 1478 questions related to 25 exams, questions related to lessons of basic sciences,
physiopathology, and clerkship were 28.7%, 18.7%, 52.6% respectively. 77.4 percent of questions
were in Taxonomy I and the rest were designed in Taxonomy II and III. 46 percent of all questions
had no structural problems while the rest had one or more structural problems. Taxonomy and
structural problems in exams related to clerkship and physiopathology were significantly less than
basic science lessons (p=0.023 and p=0.001 respectively). Questions of higher taxonomy had less
structural problems.
Conclusion: Our present study showed that the quality of MCQs regarding structural principles and
taxonomy were different in exams of different levels which necessitate further revisions.

Keywords

Educational improvement Multiple Choice Question Taxonomy Millman’s principles

© 2009, Medical Education Development Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fulltext

Fulltext is available in pdf

References

  • 1.

    Reference is available in pdf

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: